Archive for the ‘Main’ Category

Is Yahoo! Buzz A True Social Media Site?

Wednesday, February 27th, 2008

I was thrilled to see the new release of Yahoo! Buzz go live (finally). Having such a huge player offering a news-voting experience to its members could prove itself to be a giant leap in opening the Web 2.0 to all, really ALL.

(more…)

Will Social Applications Prosper in a Recession?

Monday, February 11th, 2008

Forrester recently published a research paper concluding that social applications will thrive in a recession. Ironically, this could be social media’s finest hour! You would have expected “new media” to be shelved in favor of “good ol’ media”, wouldn’t you? Well, Josh Bernoff and his team isolated the factors which they believe make going social a winning strategy.

I took the liberty of summing up two points from the paper, along with my own thoughts:

1. It’s not about awareness, it’s about engagement. Getting people to know you exist is not enough. You need to engage with them and build up a conversation. The great thing about social media is that the conversation goes all ways: if you both talk to your audience and listen to your audience, they will also talk and listen to each other - about you! Why does this matter? It matters because in hard times, consumers are less open to outside messages. But, they remain open to messages from their peers.

2. It’s cost-effective and it’s measurable. With the right strategy social media campaigns can give you an exponential return. With the right metrics and tools to track them, it’ll be easy to see the results. This makes social media the one piece of your marketing budget you really need to stick to.

It is in times of financial uncertainty and belt-tightening that tough choices are made. These choices will undoubtedly shape the form of the media markets in the years to come.

Viva la Revolution?

Monday, January 28th, 2008

I’ve written in the past that Digg is like a real-world state and that many of the real-world rules apply. The past week’s events seem to confirm that. Governments can’t change the system without some kind of public reaction. It appears Digg can’t change their algorithm without a major backlash from their users. A backlash big enough that Kevin Rose and Jay Adelson themselves turned up to “talk to the nation” in a live discussion. Here is coverage from Muhammad Saleem (himself one of the revolutionaries): from revolt to resolution in 12 hours or less

This is not the first time Digg has found itself on a collision course with its own users: back in May the removal of stories linking to cracked HD-DVD codes caused an all-out user revolt. While the long-term effects of this week’s algorithm change and user outrage remain to be seen, the dynamics of the Digg-Digger relationship make for a fascinating story. Definitely a story for the textbooks of tomorrow’s schools.

High ROI for Social Media Marketing

Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008

Engaging on social media is a hot trend, but many have doubts whether it provides actual return-on-investment (ROI). In a survey done by Collactive of close to 200 organizations, those with a successful social media strategy performed 27% better in achieving their business goals than those with poor social media strategy.

(more…)

Add a Dash of Color to Your Supporters

Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008

Highlights from the latest Collactive system upgrades:

A dash of color. Feel a bit constrained? Need some creative freedom? With the new the latest Collactive system upgrades you can customize alerts sent to your Collactive Network even more. Alerts can now include rich text, images and even video thumbnails!


(more…)

Putting the D back in Debate

Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008

The Genocide Intervention Network (GI-Net), a nonprofit working to prevent and stop genocide, recently used Collactive to put Darfur center stage in the upcoming presidential debates.

The general public been invited to submit questions for the upcoming CNN/Politico debates in LA. For this purpose Politico opened a section on their website where anyone can both submit and vote for questions.

GI-Net mobilized their Collactive Network of supporters and asked them to vote for questions on Darfur they had posted. The results were astounding: the questions rocketed into ranks #2 for both the Democratic and the Republican debates.

 

Darfur question ranked #2 on the Democratic debate

Barking up the right social tree

Thursday, January 10th, 2008

Yesterday, Chris Brogan wrote a great piece about the effectiveness of social media to companies and provided tips on how social media can benefit the organization rather than waste its valuable time. Personally, I’m a great believer in the words of Benjamin Franklin: “Great haste makes great waste”.

This is especially true when talking about my supermarket shopping habits - without preparing a list I can wander around for hours, end up with a cart stuffed to the gills only to find out when I come back home that I forgot some unimportant items such as milk.

Discovering social media is a bit like deciding which country you want to take your next vacation in - there are plenty of countries out there, each with its own culture, landscape and different mix of people. It’s all about what is right for you and the issues you care about. Having a presence on Facebook, MySpace, Digg or any site that pops up in the news won’t necessarily increase your sales leads, donors or supporters - much like taking the Eurostar and crossing Europe at 186mph doesn’t mean you’ve actually been to Europe.

Having the right presence in the right network however will get you there. And by network I don’t mean choosing Facebook over MySpace (or vice versa). Or Digg. Or YouTube. These sites have such big communities that in each of them you can find a group of people that care about what you do and the issues you’d like to promote. But it takes time, planning and most importantly - patience. You can’t learn all the local customs in a week (although having a travel guide does help ;).

Social Media Security Through Obscurity?

Tuesday, January 8th, 2008

This is a follow-up to my conversation on Muhammad Saleem’s recent post Should Social News Be a Republic Rather Than a Democracy?

Picture this: the citizens of New Oceania live happy and fulfilling lives. New Oceania is a proud democratic state - in fact, a direct democracy - and as such holds regular referendums. Lively debates surround the election process. When the time comes, citizens go to the polls and enter their votes into New Oceania’s advanced computerized voting systems.

But, something is amiss in New Oceania. The computerized voting system has been designed to prevent abuse of the state’s direct democracy. Some voters are blacklisted, others are counted twice or even more. Sometimes, bills are discarded altogether after just a handful of opponents leave the polling stations. All of this should be fine as it serves the goal of preserving the state’s voting system. The problem is, nobody knows how it works.

In a blog post over a year ago Scott Karp wrote, “A “democracy” that has to forgo transparency in order to avoid becoming undemocratic has already ceded its democratic ideals.”. This holds for the fictional New Oceania and it also holds for the subject of Scott’s piece and of my own allegory. Don’t get me wrong, I love Digg. Like many other Diggers, I would love to understand how I am being measured! Participating in one of the most exciting and enjoyable social experiments on the web could be made better if it was a little less shrouded by obscurity.

In the computer security field there is a concept called Security by Obscurity. Any security expert will tell you that if this is your only defense - if the secrecy of your algorithm is all that protects it - your time will eventually run out. The bad guys will steal it and exploit its weaknesses instead of the good guys analyzing it and ensuring, in a community-wide effort, that it is inherently secure. I believe that social media security should not be based on obscurity either.

My Social Media New Year’s Resolutions

Monday, January 7th, 2008

Rohit from Influential Marketing Blog blogged last week about his 3 Social Media New Year’s Resolutions. I figured I’d take a shot at some resolutions, so here’s my own take on the three he listed.

1. Comment more. Keeping up with blog reading, commenting and writing takes time. A lot of time. How do I keep up with where I’ve commented, what I wrote about, when I wrote it? It takes some effort. This year, I will take more time to blog, listen and converse.

2. Answer the phone more (sorry Rohit, but I’ve got to disagree on this one - perhaps it’s my upbringing that prevents from not answering!) The great thing about social media work is that you meet real and interesting people. A natural consequence of meeting them on social media sites is that you have a lot in common. This year, I want to converse more with the people behind the profiles, avatars or submissions.

3. Befriend and be a friend. I’ve been spending time recently on Digg reaching out to friends and getting to know them better. It’s a tricky task that requires you to walk the line between network building and just plain procrastination. This year, I want spend just the right amount of time giving my social network friends the attention they deserve.

Happy New Year!

Promoting Your Cause on Digg

Monday, December 24th, 2007

More than a million individuals visit Digg’s front page and sift through the stories each day. A story that reaches the front page will be “hit” with a maelstrom of 10-20K unique visitors within a matter of hours, a phenomenon so incredible that it received its own name - the “Digg effect”, and is known to bring webservers to their virtual knees. However, getting enough votes to reach the front page proved to be an almost impossible feat. In this article we wanted to show a new, different approach for getting an audience for your cause with Digg - an approach that is ethical, effective and quite fulfilling.

Many users try to tap into the shortlist of Digg’s viewers and promote their own content, just to find that it is much harder than it seems. Out of the 4000 articles submitted daily to Digg, only a hundred, one in forty, reach the front page. Even the top Digg users, who know every nook and cranny, can’t seem to get more than 25% of their stories to the front page. The usual case for a casual story submitter is to have his article ignored completely, without even a single vote, ignoring the article’s possibly superb content.

On first sight, it may seem that the Digg social editorial experience is limited to none but the site’s “top dogs” but this is far from true. If you really believe in your cause and are ready to invest time to promote it within the Digg community, we can offer a method with which you can make sure your cause receives the attention it deserves. (more…)